\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
WhatsApp
Accreditation operating model

A clearer path from accreditation requirements to institutional readiness.

Accredia360 brings cycles, ownership, evidence, reviews, decisions and readiness visibility into one structured operating flow for higher education teams.

One connected flowFrom cycle to readiness
Clear ownershipContributor · Reviewer · Approver
Live visibilityEvidence and readiness status
Cycle setupStructure the work
Evidence reviewContributor → Reviewer → Approver
ReadinessSee progress in one view

One connected accreditation workflow

Six workflow stages. One connected process.

The platform structures the work around the way accreditation teams actually operate: establish the cycle, assign accountability, build the evidence set, review it, make decisions and monitor readiness.

01

Establish the cycle

Define the cycle type, duration, dates and important deadlines before work begins.

02

Map responsibility

Connect authorities, criteria and users so every requirement has visible ownership.

03

Assemble the evidence record

Contributors upload supporting records against the relevant requirement or evidence item.

04

Review evidence

Reviewers check completeness and quality and can request changes or clarification.

05

Record workflow decisions

Approvers provide the final approval or rejection and can trigger decision notifications.

06

Review readiness

Use progress views and dashboards to understand evidence status and cycle-level readiness.

Responsibility mapping

Assigned users can see the responsibilities connected to their evidence work.

Each evidence item can be connected to defined roles, creating a traceable path from contribution through quality review to final decision.

Contributor

Creates and uploads evidence documents. Multiple contributors can be assigned where required.

Reviewer

Checks evidence for completeness and quality and can initiate comments, rework requests and notifications.

Approver

Makes the final approval or rejection decision and can send decision-related notifications.

Evidence workflow

Evidence remains connected to its workflow state.

Accredia360 provides a centralized evidence repository linked to criteria, clauses or metrics, with status tracking and deadline visibility.

InitiatedIn ProgressReady for ReviewApprovedRejected
Accredia360 My Evidence workspace
My Evidence — a focused workspace for evidence contributors and their assigned work.
Accredia360 evidence approval workspace
Manage Evidence — review and approval activity stays connected to the evidence record.

Review and decision workflow

Move from submission through review to a recorded decision.

Reviewer actions, rework requests and approver decisions can be reflected in the evidence workflow, helping teams reduce manual follow-up.

Readiness information

Bring workflow activity into an institution-level view.

Readiness monitoring can surface evidence counts, completion percentage, workflow states, reviewer and approver assignments, cycle analytics and progress charts.

Accredia360 evidence readiness dashboard
Evidence Dashboard — a consolidated view of progress and workflow status.

Configurable requirements

The workflow can be configured as accreditation requirements change.

Accredia360 is designed as a configurable accreditation engine. Standards, requirements, evidence items, templates and compliance logic can be defined for new cycles.

Accredia360 modules and utilities
Modules & Utilities — connected product capabilities for accreditation operations.

Accredia360 questions

Accredia360 questions and answers

Accredia360 is a configurable platform for higher education institutions. It organizes accreditation evidence, responsibilities, workflow decisions and readiness information.

DigitalEdu provides ready-made configuration packs for NAAC, NBA, NIRF and NABET. Accredia360 is also configurable so institutions or DigitalEdu can define or add standards, requirements, evidence items, templates and compliance logic for a cycle.

Yes. The platform supports AQAR and SSR filing cycles with dedicated cycle definitions, deadlines and evidence mapping.

Yes. Readiness monitoring includes evidence counts, completion percentage, pipeline and review states, clause-level reviewer and approver assignment views, cycle analytics and progress charts.

Yes. Accredia360 supports multiple accreditation cycles simultaneously, including cycle duration, internal or external type, dates, deadlines and visual status tracking.

Yes. The Manage User Achievement module enables faculty and staff to submit professional activities, awards and achievements using structured classification such as achievement level and achievement type, with supporting documentation.

The product document identifies support for Revised Framework (RAF), Binary Accreditation Framework (BAF), and Maturity-Based Graded Levels (MBGL) configuration.

Yes. EduNova's OBE Track works alongside Accredia360 for CO-PO-PSO evaluation, mapping and attainment, assessment evidence linkage, gap analysis, continuous improvement tracking and accreditation-ready outcome reports.

It is designed for principals, directors, accreditation leaders, administrators, accreditation coordinators, criteria in-charges, department coordinators, IQAC and quality assurance teams, and faculty contributors.

Yes. Accredia360 is described as a highly configurable accreditation engine in which institutions or DigitalEdu can define or add standards, requirements, evidence items, templates and compliance logic for a cycle.

No. Accredia360 supports structured accreditation and compliance processes, evidence management and readiness monitoring. The product document does not claim or guarantee accreditation outcomes.

Institutional consultation

Want to discuss an accreditation workflow?

Explore how Accredia360 can support your institution's accreditation cycles, evidence management, ownership workflows, readiness monitoring and quality processes.

Universities • Autonomous Institutions • Colleges • IQAC Teams • Accreditation Leaders

Designed For Principals & Directors Accreditation Coordinators IQAC Teams Criteria In-Charges Department Coordinators Faculty Contributors

Suitable for higher education institutions, IQAC teams, accreditation coordinators, criteria owners and faculty contributors.

Institutional consultation Focus
Multi-Framework Configuration Explore NAAC, NBA, NIRF, NABET and configurable accreditation standards.
Evidence Management Centralize evidence and map it to criteria, clauses, metrics and deadlines.
Role-Based Workflow Define Contributor, Reviewer and Approver responsibilities.
Readiness Track Readinessing Track Readiness evidence completion, workflow states and accreditation cycle progress.
Faculty Achievements Capture structured awards, patents, fellowships and professional contributions.
OBE Track Complement Add CO-PO-PSO attainment and outcome analytics when paired with OBE Track.